包容式领导与代际合作：文化价值观的调节功能
Article ID:
349
关键词:
包容型领导；跨代际文化融合；新生代员工；文化价值观；调节效应
摘要
在现代组织管理领域，不同代际之间的文化矛盾已成为引人注目的挑战。本探讨通过社会交换学说和文化适应学说，建立一 个包括包容型领导对跨代际组织文化融合作用的调节效应模型，重点分析新生代员工文化价值观念（如权力距离倾向与个人主义特性） 的调节作用，针对华东、华南以及西南地区 47 家企业的 618 名新生代员工与其直接上级开展三阶段配对问卷调查，之后运用层次回 归分析与 Bootstrap 方法开展假设验证。相关研究显示，包容性领导所包括的开放性、可用性和可及性这三个方面，均会对跨代文化 融合产生明显的积极效应。权力距离取向会正向作用于包容性领导与文化融合的关联，而个人主义倾向显示出倒 U 型的调节效果， 当处于中等程度时，包容性领导的促进作用最为突出。该研究拓展在包容性领导和跨代际管理融合领域的研究，给组织化解代际文化 冲突、推动文化共融提供理论支撑与实践指引。
参考
[1] Joshi A, Dencker J C, Franz G. Generations in organizations [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2011, 31: 177-205.
[2] Twenge J M. A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2010, 25(2): 201-210.
[3] Lyons S, Kuron L. Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014, 35(S1): S139-S157.
[4] Shore L M, Randel A E, Chung B G, et al. Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research [J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(4): 1262-1289.
[5] Carmeli A, Reiter-Palmon R, Ziv E. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety [J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2010, 22(3): 250-260.
[6] 唐宁玉 , 张凯丽 . 包容性领导研究述评与展望 [J]. 管理学报 , 2015, 12(6): 932-938.
[7] 李燕萍 , 侯烜方 . 新生代员工工作价值观结构及其对工作行为的影响机理 [J]. 经济管理 , 2012, 34(5): 77-86.
[8] Berry J W. Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures [J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2005, 29(6): 697-712.
[9] Nembhard I M, Edmondson A C. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(7): 941-966.
[10] Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations [M]. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
[11] Blau P M. Exchange and Power in Social Life [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
[12] Dorfman P W, Howell J P. Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited [J]. Advances in International Comparative Management, 1988, 3: 127-150.
[13] Triandis H C, Gelfand M J. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism [J]. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(1): 118-128.
[14] Costanza D P, Finkelstein L M. Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there? [J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2015, 8(3): 308-323.
[15] Avolio B J, Bass B M. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and Sampler Set [M]. 3rd ed. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden, 2004.
[2] Twenge J M. A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2010, 25(2): 201-210.
[3] Lyons S, Kuron L. Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2014, 35(S1): S139-S157.
[4] Shore L M, Randel A E, Chung B G, et al. Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research [J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37(4): 1262-1289.
[5] Carmeli A, Reiter-Palmon R, Ziv E. Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety [J]. Creativity Research Journal, 2010, 22(3): 250-260.
[6] 唐宁玉 , 张凯丽 . 包容性领导研究述评与展望 [J]. 管理学报 , 2015, 12(6): 932-938.
[7] 李燕萍 , 侯烜方 . 新生代员工工作价值观结构及其对工作行为的影响机理 [J]. 经济管理 , 2012, 34(5): 77-86.
[8] Berry J W. Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures [J]. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2005, 29(6): 697-712.
[9] Nembhard I M, Edmondson A C. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27(7): 941-966.
[10] Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations [M]. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001.
[11] Blau P M. Exchange and Power in Social Life [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964.
[12] Dorfman P W, Howell J P. Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited [J]. Advances in International Comparative Management, 1988, 3: 127-150.
[13] Triandis H C, Gelfand M J. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism [J]. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(1): 118-128.
[14] Costanza D P, Finkelstein L M. Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there? [J]. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2015, 8(3): 308-323.
[15] Avolio B J, Bass B M. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and Sampler Set [M]. 3rd ed. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden, 2004.
已出版
2026-09-18
栏目
Articles
艺博科研学术出版社致力于保障作者的版权和所有信息，确保这些权益得到法律的充分保护。无论您是否选择在我们出版社发表文章，我们都会要求每一位员工遵循行业内最高的道德标准、承担责任，并履行法律义务。
为了进一步保护作者的权益，我们在官网上提供了详尽的版权协议信息，供您查阅。在文章的再使用权利方面，艺博科研学术出版社持开放态度，严格遵守CC BY-NC 4.0出版条例。这一条例不仅为作者提供了版权保护，也满足了开放获取学术出版协会（OASPA）对使用权利的标准。
对于那些希望进一步保护自己文章的作者，我们还提供了CC BY-NC条例服务。根据作者选择的CC条例，文章的原始版权和再使用权利将在文章中明确展示。这样的做法不仅尊重了作者的知识产权，也促进了学术成果的合理传播和使用
